Stage 3: Responses to the Review


Prepare responses from unit head.
▪ Prepare responses from Dean/Director
▪ Approximately 4 months

   

Response from the Unit Head

Upon receipt of the External Review Report, the relevant Dean/Director shall request the unit head, in consultation with the unit, to prepare a response addressing any/all recommendations arising from the review. The report should include a plan for revising/restructuring the program, as needed, along with a timeline for implementation and completion, and any budgetary implications.

Please refer to the Unit Response Summary Table in the right-hand menu for an example on how to address the recommendations of the external review report.

The unit’s response should be submitted to the Dean within three (3) months of receipt of the External Review Report, with a view to implementation of any recommendations within six (6) months.

Back to top.

Response from the Dean/Director's Office

Within one (1) month of receipt of the unit’s response, the Dean/Director shall submit to the Vice-President (Academic) and Provost, via the Vice-Provost (Academic Planning and Programs), copies of the unit’s response, along with a review of the unit’s plan.

Back to top.

Undergraduate Program Review
Supporting Materials


Proceed to Stage 1: Self-Evaluation and Nomination of Reviewers
   
Proceed to Stage 2: External Review
   
Stage 3: Responses to Review
  
Associated Templates
Unit Response Summary Table 
   
Proceed to Stage 4: Assessment by Office of the Vice-President (Academic) & Provost


Additional Resources
Procedures for the Periodic Review of
   Undergraduate Programs, April 2013
Checklist for Administrators
Governing Documents
Office of Institutional Analysis
Registrar's Office


Questions or Concerns?

For further information on undergraduate program review, please contact:

Cassandra Davidson
Undergraduate Program Analyst
204.474.7847

Cassandra.Davidson@ad.umanitoba.ca


Back to Undergraduate Program Review