|▪ Assessment by Provost and Vice-President (Academic)
▪ Summary report to Senate Committee on Academic Review
Following receipt of all reports, the Vice-Provost (Integrated Planning & Academic Programs) may invite the relevant Dean/Director, and the unit head, to discuss the review prior to preparing a report to the Provost, and the Senate Committee on Academic Review (SCAR).
The Provost and Vice-President (Academic) shall then provide a written assessment of each academic review to SCAR.
Following completion of an academic review, the Senate Committee on Academic Review (SCAR) may comment or recommend to the Provost and Vice-President (Academic), on:
SCAR shall report annually to Senate on the status of academic reviews.
Within one year of receipt of the responses from the relevant Dean/Director, the Provost and Vice-President (Academic) may contact the unit and request a report outlining the unit’s progress on implementing its plan. If the plan has not been fully implemented, further reports of the unit may be required.
|Stage 1: Self- Evaluation and Nomination of Reviewers ►|
|Stage 2: External Review ►|
|Stage 3: Responses to Review ►|
|Stage 4: Assessment by Office of the Provost & Vice-President (Academic)|