Hypertext structures and ethnographic comparison as implemented in
"Kinship and Social Organization: An Interactive Tutorial"
A presentation for the AAA Annual Meetings, November 20, 1997, Washington,
D.C.
Brian Schwimmer
Dept of Anthropology
University of Manitoba
Note that activating the links in this file
will open a second window to display the content.
You must return to the current window to continue reading the article.
Abstract.
Hypertext organization of ethnographic data promises to be a major enhancement of emerging computer assisted modes of explication for anthropology. Its capacity to substitute multilayered and multistranded sequencing for linear text presentation introduces advantages on descriptive, instructional, and theoretical levels. In this presentation, I will investigate the instructional uses of hypertext to link ethnographic examples and analytical concepts my WWW based tutorial: " Kinship and Social Organization: An Interactive Tutorial". I will reflect on both the practical educational advantages of hypertext structures and upon some of the wider theoretical issues of constructing ethnography and linking data and theory.
Presentation
Notice: This is text is being revised for publication. Quotation or citation is not permitted without the consent of the author.
Over the past several years, the construction and interpretation of ethnographic texts have received a good deal of critical attention. Among other problems, the linear sequencing of cultural representations imposes limitations on the translation of multifaceted meaning systems and on the presentation of data from a variety of interpretive perspectives. The emergence of computer mediated authoring systems, and especially of hypertext, has introduced a means of freeing description and analysis from the narrow strictures of the printed page and offers many new modes of ethnographic writing, which we are only beginning to explore. This presentation focuses on the basic and relatively modest task of applying hypertext design principles to kinship instruction in a World Wide Web based tutorial.
Hypertext authoring is based on a fairly straightforward procedure of formatting a text sequence or image within a file to provide access to a second document within a computerized presentation. This elementary process opens a broad range of possibilities of constructing and illustrating texts by adding an entirely new dimension to the traditional linear sequencing arrangements. One implication of this enhancement that has received much attention is that it can bring readers into the authoring process by allowing them to organize the content they receive along pathways constructed according to their own criteria and choices. A second strategy involves the author in enhancing his or her composition through the design and construction of a hypertext structure that is sequenced along and through several different dimensions of exposition. This process is organized in two different ways: multilayering and multistranding
Multilayering
| Multilayering involves the composition of two or more separate texts, (A and B) each of which is organized in standard linear order and coordinated through hypertext links so that the topics they discuss (1-3) run in parallel. Links from one file to the next (in red) establish the main sequential reading order, while internal links (in green) allow for systematic crossreferencing. |
This technique can be applied to solve a number of problems of ethnographic description and analysis.
Levels of
Abstraction
| Analytical | Case Study
| Ethnography
|
|
Akan
|
Hebrew
|
Turkish
|
Yanomamo
|
Dani
| Turkish Village
|
Descent
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Marriage
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| X
|
Residence
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
| X
|
Kin Terms
| X
| X
| X |
| | ||||||||||||
An additional level of broad empirical description is provided by references
to full text ethnographics that are either on-line, as
Paul Stirling's Turkish Village, or available in printed texts.
Stirling's Web project actually incorporates a fourth
level, as he is in the process of constructing
a searchable archive of his original field notes.
Multistranding
| Multistranding involves the development of structured connections between links set within files and across layers to provide alternate pathways through the content that anticipate different representation strategies, learning styles, and interest foci. In the course of the kinship tutorial, I have considered three different ways that a viewer might approach the integration of the content. Many other learning and presentation models can also be formulated. | ![]() |
|
Ethnographic illustration of ethnological concepts:
|
A Comparison of Five Lineage Systems |
|||||
| Depth | Akan | Hebrews | Yanomamo | Turkish | Dani |
| 0-3 | Minimal Segment |
Minimal Segment |
Minimal Segment |
Household | |
| 4-6 | Minor Segment |
Lineage/ Moiety |
Lineage | ||
| 7-9 | Clan/Sib | ||||
| 10-12 | Major Segment |
Minor Segment |
|||
| 13-15 | Moiety | ||||
| 16-18 | Clan | Major Segment |
|||
| 19-21 | Maximal Segment |
||||
Extended case study
This technique is attributable to both Gluckman and Bateson and involves the development of a number of analytical threads from the starting point of a single cultural event, in both cases, a public ceremony. In my example I focus on a particular mythical cycle, that of the Hebrew patriarchs and matriarchs from the Old Testament, to provide a window into a number of important social institutions, such as inheritance, incest, and marriage regulations.
| Initial links are set to ethnographic descriptions of ancient Hebrew institutions in which subsequent links to abstract and comparative material are embedded for further investigation. |
I have so far restricted my application of hypertext composition strategies discussed in this presentation to fairly simple context of illustrating ethnological principles in terms of ethnographic material. However, there are numerous other possibilities for wider and more sophisticated development of these techniques to the writing of ethnography in ways which more suitably model the complexity of cultural structures and interpretations than standard media have so far allowed.